
Jefferies Financial Group has fully divested its Bitcoin holdings from its flagship long-only pension portfolio, marking a significant reversal for the investment bank as it warns of "existential" threats posed by accelerating advances in quantum computing.
In the latest edition of the widely followed "GREED & fear" report released on January 16, 2026, Jefferies’ Global Head of Equity Strategy, Christopher Wood, disclosed that the firm has removed its entire 10% allocation to Bitcoin.
The capital has been reallocated into traditional safe-haven assets, split evenly between physical gold and gold-mining equities.
The move represents a major shift in institutional sentiment. Wood, who first introduced Bitcoin to the model portfolio in December 2020 at approximately $22,700, cited the emergence of Cryptographically Relevant Quantum Computers (CRQCs) as the primary catalyst for the exit.
While Bitcoin has surged roughly 325% since Jefferies' initial entry, far outperforming gold's 145% gain in the same period, Wood argued that the asset’s "store of value" thesis is fundamentally compromised for long-term investors.
"While GREED & fear does not believe that the quantum issue is about to hit the Bitcoin price dramatically in the near term, the store of value concept is clearly on less solid foundation from the standpoint of a long-term pension portfolio," the report stated.
The report highlights a growing technical debate within the digital asset community regarding public-key cryptography. Under current classical computing, deriving a private key from a public key is computationally impossible. However, Jefferies warns that quantum machines could potentially achieve this in "hours or days."
Specific institutional vulnerabilities noted in the report include:
The decision to pivot back to gold underscores a growing divergence in institutional risk management. With the removal of the 10% Bitcoin stake, the Jefferies portfolio now maintains a 70% combined exposure to gold and gold-related assets.
The strategist characterized the refusal by some in the crypto community to address these cryptographic vulnerabilities as a "suicidal delusion," suggesting that "burning" of vulnerable coins would undermine the very property rights that institutional investors rely on.
[Disclaimer: The content of this article is intended for entertainment and educational purposes only. No content published by Block319 is intended to constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Block319 will not be liable for any losses incurred as a result of interacting with any platforms, products or services mentioned in this article. The blockchain industry is always risky. Always do your own research before engaging with any platform, product or service. If you believe the information included in this article is incorrect, please send an email to info@block319.com and we will endeavour to respond as soon as possible.]